Laser Season Is Coming: 1540 Laser Resurfacing Recovery in Denver
When people hear "laser resurfacing," they usually picture a week of peeling skin and a lot of hiding indoors. The 1540 is not that laser. It works below the surface without removing the top layer of your skin, and most people are pink and a little swollen for about 24 to 48 hours rather than a week.
The word that makes the difference is non-ablative. The lasers people remember from twenty years ago were ablative. Timing matters too: sun exposure around the time of your treatment drives the risk of pigment changes afterward, which is why providers book resurfacing for the cooler months.
What does "non-ablative" mean?
Ablative lasers, like CO2 and Er:YAG, target the water in your skin and vaporize tissue. They remove the surface, and your skin has to rebuild it. Non-ablative lasers send energy down into the dermis and leave the outer layer intact.
The 1540 is also fractional, which means it treats the skin in tiny columns and leaves untreated skin in between. Picture aerating a lawn rather than resodding it. The untouched tissue around each column helps the treated columns heal, and that is what keeps the downtime short.
Over the following days, the heated tissue works its way up and out through the epidermis as microscopic debris and flakes away. That is the gritty, faintly bronzed look patients describe, a bit like fine sandpaper or coffee grounds.
Underneath, the point is collagen. In a study of stretch mark treatment, skin biopsies taken a month after the final session showed a thicker epidermis and dermis, new collagen, and more elastin. The laser is not sanding anything down. It is prompting your skin to rebuild.
What is the 1540 laser cleared to treat?
The 1540 is FDA-cleared, not FDA-approved. Lasers reach the market through the FDA's 510(k) pathway, where the agency determines that a device is substantially equivalent to one already legally sold. Approval is a separate and higher bar. The two words get used interchangeably in advertising, and they do not mean the same thing.
The 1540 fractional non-ablative handpiece is cleared for coagulation of soft tissue, skin resurfacing procedures, and the treatment of melasma, striae (stretch marks), acne scars, and surgical scars. Used on its own, it is not cleared specifically for wrinkles or fine lines. Those words belong to the ablative 2940 handpiece and to combination treatments that include it, not to the 1540 on its own. Treating outside a cleared indication is legal and common in medicine.
In the first randomized trial of the 1540 for acne scars, with blinded evaluation, treated atrophic scars were rated significantly smoother than untreated areas at both 4 and 12 weeks after the final session, though the trial was small. In a 51-patient stretch mark study, non-blinded clinical assessments rated every patient at least 50 percent improved at six months or later, and on a blinded review of 11 image sets, independent evaluators scored a 51 to 75 percent mean improvement. Among the patients who came back to be examined at 18 to 24 months, the stretch marks had not returned. That is meaningful improvement, not removal.
If acne scarring is your main concern, we compared the options side by side in Best Treatments for Acne Scars in Denver. And if you are weighing this against an IPL photofacial, the short version is that IPL treats color at the surface, meaning brown spots and redness, while the 1540 treats texture down in the dermis. Plenty of people end up doing both, in sequence.
What does 1540 laser recovery look like?
For comparison, recovery from the older continuous-beam CO2 laser typically ran about a week or more, with swelling, lingering redness, and a risk of pigment changes that could surface much later.
With non-ablative fractional treatment, most patients have redness and swelling for 24 to 48 hours. The downtime is shorter, not absent.
A ten-year safety review at a single center looked at 1,160 non-ablative fractional 1540 treatments. About 12 percent of treatments came with a side effect. The most common were extended redness (7.84 percent of treatments), swelling (2.41 percent), and crusting (1.47 percent). The randomized trial also reported moderate pain, blistering, and crusting in some patients. Most people do not have these. Some people do.
[verify: Krista to confirm Redbud's aftercare protocol and typical return-to-makeup and return-to-work guidance, which no published study defines.]
Why is fall the right window for resurfacing?
The concern is post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, the brown discoloration that can follow any treatment that inflames the skin. Melanin absorbs laser energy, so the risk runs highest in Fitzpatrick skin types III through VI and in deeper skin tones generally. Recently sun-exposed skin holds more melanin.
Published clinical guidance says the risk of dyspigmentation can be reduced by avoiding sun exposure before and after laser treatment, and that strict sun avoidance for approximately two weeks before treatment lowers the chance of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. That same guidance says facial resurfacing is best avoided during the summer months, with its strongest emphasis on continuous-wave ablative lasers.
We could not find a study comparing patients treated in the fall to patients treated in the summer. "Laser season" is a scheduling convention, and it rests on a documented mechanism: less sun before your treatment and less sun while you heal means less pigment risk. And if post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation does happen, it typically fades over 3 to 4 months.
UV intensity rises about 6 percent for every kilometer of elevation, and Denver sits about a mile up, roughly 1.6 kilometers. That puts our sun around 10 percent stronger than it is at sea level on a comparable day. If you are also planning laser hair removal, the fall calendar works there too, for a different reason: that laser reads pigment in the hair, so the timing question is about your tan rather than about healing.
How many sessions will you need, and when do results show?
Across non-ablative fractional lasers generally, most people seem to reach their result within 4 to 6 treatments spaced about four weeks apart. The published 1540 studies used shorter courses than that: three monthly sessions in the acne scar trial, and two to four sessions at four to six week intervals for stretch marks. Plan on somewhere between 2 and 6 sessions about a month apart, depending on what we are treating and how deep it sits.
Results are not immediate, and collagen is the reason. Studies measured their outcomes 4 to 12 weeks after the final session. A series that starts in early fall is doing its collagen work straight through the winter.
Your plan depends on what we are treating and how your skin responds. [verify: Krista to confirm Redbud's typical 1540 series length.] Pricing is built around the plan you and your provider settle on at the consult. [PRICE: Tanna to confirm]
Who is a good candidate, and who should wait?
Deeper skin tones are not excluded. The evidence supports non-ablative fractional resurfacing in Fitzpatrick types IV through VI using lower treatment densities and extra pigment precautions, though high-quality data for types V and VI is still limited. The right answer there is more conservative settings and a careful conversation, not a no.
Some things mean waiting, or at least raising your hand at the consult. A fresh tan or significant recent sun exposure. An active skin infection, or active skin disease at the treatment area. A history of cold sores, in which case your provider may prescribe an antiviral beforehand. Recent isotretinoin (Accutane) use deserves a real conversation, since the conventional recommendation is to wait 6 to 12 months after stopping, even though the evidence behind a blanket ban is weaker than it is usually presented. Prior radiation therapy to the area, photosensitizing medications, and any past gold therapy all need to be on the table before we set a single laser parameter. We do not treat during pregnancy.
For general questions about candidacy and what a first visit looks like, our FAQ page covers them.
What to expect at Redbud
You start with a consult, not with a laser. We look at your skin, ask what has been bothering you long enough that you finally looked it up, and talk through whether the 1540 is the right tool or whether something else fits your goal better. Our providers perform these treatments, and settings are matched to your skin rather than run off a template. If we do not think this is the right treatment for you, we will tell you that. You can meet our providers before you come in.
If you have been putting off resurfacing because you could not spare a week, this is the season to ask about it. Booking now also means the healing part is well behind you by the holidays. Book a consultation and we will build a plan around your skin and your calendar.
This article is for education and is not medical advice. The 1540 fractional non-ablative laser handpiece is FDA-cleared through the 510(k) pathway for coagulation of soft tissue, skin resurfacing procedures, and the treatment of melasma, striae, acne scars, and surgical scars. It is not FDA-approved, and on its own it is not cleared specifically for wrinkles or fine lines. Individual results vary. Talk with a licensed medical provider about your own skin, your history, and your medications before starting any treatment.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is the 1540 painful?
We apply strong topical numbing for comfort. Most clients find treatment tolerable, with sensations of warmth and prickling.
Sources
- U.S. FDA, 510(k) K142376, Palomar Icon Aesthetic System, Indications for Use (cleared September 24, 2014)
- Laser Complications. StatPearls, National Library of Medicine
- Update on fractional laser technology. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010;3(1):42-50
- Hedelund L, et al. Fractional nonablative 1,540-nm laser resurfacing of atrophic acne scars: a randomized controlled trial with blinded response evaluation. Lasers Med Sci. 2010
- de Angelis F, et al. Fractional nonablative 1540-nm laser treatment of striae distensae in Fitzpatrick skin types II to IV. Aesthet Surg J. 2011
- De La Garza H, et al. Adverse events associated with 1540-nm nonablative fractional resurfacing in darker skin. JAAD Int. 2024;14:84-86
- Kaushik SB, Alexis AF. Nonablative fractional laser resurfacing in skin of color: an evidence-based review. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2017;10(6):51-67
- Sharma AN, Patel BC. Laser Fitzpatrick skin type recommendations. StatPearls, National Library of Medicine
- U.S. EPA, Learn About the UV Index
Aesthetic Nurse Injector at Redbud Medical Spa
Ready to Explore Your Options?
Book an appointment with one of our providers.


